SEC Form 4 Insider Trading Window Screener
1,704,500.00 in illegal corporate blackout window insider stock sales identified across across 2 items.
CEO sold $1,212,500.00 of stock on March 24 during quarterly blackout window without a 10b5-1 plan. Severe SEC enforcement exposure under Policy Section 1.
Method1Audited Section 16 insider transaction dates against corporate quarterly blackout windows.
2Verified Rule 10b5-1 affirmative defense safe harbor parameters and drafted board notification brief.
| Reference | Description | Disputed_Trade_Value |
|---|---|---|
| Vance_Robert | CEO Open Market Sale During Blackout Window | 1,212,500.00 |
| Miller_Arthur | Director Open Market Sale During Blackout | 492,000.00 |
Director and officer stock trade execution files, plus corporate insider trading policy blackout dates and 10b5-1 plans
SEC Form 4 compliance audit report and blackout trading policy breach memorandum (Resolution Dossier, Findings Schedule)
Open SEC Form 4 Insider Trading Window Screener on sample data now with no sign-up, then run your own files free for 14 days. $3,000 a month after that, cancel any time. 30% goes to the referring partner.
Read in memory for the session, never stored, never used to train a model.
Not financial, investment, banking or securities advice. Filings and screening results must be reviewed by a qualified compliance professional. Letters, notices and legal analysis are drafts, not legal advice. Have a qualified lawyer review them before they are sent or relied on.
14 days on your own files, then $3,000 a month.
Open SEC Form 4 Insider Trading Window Screener on sample data now with no sign-up, then run your own files free for 14 days. $3,000 a month after that, cancel any time.
On a sample file: 1,704,500.00 in illegal corporate blackout window insider stock sales identified across across 2 items.
Why not just use ChatGPT?
Rules that stay current: the rate cards, tariffs, code sets and regulations it checks against are kept up to date for you; a one-off prompt starts from nothing each time. Evidence that stands up: every finding cites the line, the file and the rule, so it holds up with a vendor, a payer or an auditor. The same answer every time: the checks are written rules, not a fresh guess, so this month's result can be compared with last month's. Nobody has to own it: no one inside has to build, test and maintain a home-made tool, and files are not pasted into a public chatbot.
Start on your own files
If you would rather talk it through, write to dev.sathya@baseloom.app; that reaches Dev Sathya, founder.