Influencer FTC Endorsement Disclosure Screener
3.00 in deceptive influencer marketing posts violating FTC endorsement disclosure rules identified across across 3 items.
Paid ambassador post completely omitted sponsorship disclosures. Direct violation of FTC 16 CFR Part 255. High regulatory penalty exposure.
Method1Audited post caption transcripts against FTC clear and conspicuous prominence standards.
2Generated formal breach-of-contract cure notices demanding immediate caption updates.
| Reference | Description | Violative_Posts |
|---|---|---|
| POST-103 | Complete Omission of Paid Brand Ambassadorship | 1.00 |
| POST-101 | Truncated Below-the-Fold Disclosure on Gifted Item | 1.00 |
| POST-104 | Ambiguous Collab Tag on Affiliate Commission Post | 1.00 |
Influencer post text archives and campaign tracking logs, plus FTC 16 CFR Part 255 endorsement guidelines
FTC compliance risk audit report and influencer corrective notice letters (Resolution Dossier, Findings Schedule)
Open Influencer FTC Endorsement Disclosure Screener on sample data now with no sign-up, then run your own files free for 14 days. $2,500 a month after that, cancel any time. 30% goes to the referring partner.
Read in memory for the session, never stored, never used to train a model.
Letters, notices and legal analysis are drafts, not legal advice. Have a qualified lawyer review them before they are sent or relied on.
14 days on your own files, then $2,500 a month.
Open Influencer FTC Endorsement Disclosure Screener on sample data now with no sign-up, then run your own files free for 14 days. $2,500 a month after that, cancel any time.
On a sample file: 3.00 in deceptive influencer marketing posts violating FTC endorsement disclosure rules identified across across 3 items.
Why not just use ChatGPT?
Rules that stay current: the rate cards, tariffs, code sets and regulations it checks against are kept up to date for you; a one-off prompt starts from nothing each time. Evidence that stands up: every finding cites the line, the file and the rule, so it holds up with a vendor, a payer or an auditor. The same answer every time: the checks are written rules, not a fresh guess, so this month's result can be compared with last month's. Nobody has to own it: no one inside has to build, test and maintain a home-made tool, and files are not pasted into a public chatbot.
Start on your own files
If you would rather talk it through, write to dev.sathya@baseloom.app; that reaches Dev Sathya, founder.