Commercial Lease Co-Tenancy Anchor Auditor
$51,900.00 in commercial lease co-tenancy rent overpayments identified for recovery across across 2 items.
Nordstrom remained dark since November. Tenant entitled to pay 50% Base Rent ($9,250.00/mo vs $18,500.00 paid). Overpayment across 4 months is $37,000.00 under Section 8.3.
Method1Audited shopping center historical anchor occupancy against lease co-tenancy covenants.
2Calculated substitute rent remedies (50% base or 3% gross sales) and drafted landlord refund demand.
| Reference | Description | Overpaid_Rent |
|---|---|---|
| STR-401 | Anchor Closure Substitute Rent Remedy (Jan-Apr) | $37,000.00 |
| STR-401 | April Alternative Percentage Rent Option | $14,900.00 |
Retail chain monthly sales and rent statements, plus shopping center anchor tenant occupancy rosters and lease co-tenancy riders
Substitute co-tenancy rent recalculation notice and retroactive overpayment demand letter (Resolution Dossier, Findings Schedule)
Run Commercial Lease Co-Tenancy Anchor Auditor free on the last 12 months of files. If it finds money, the fee is 15 percent of what is actually recovered, nothing on what is not. After that, ongoing monitoring is $1,750 a month. 30% goes to the referring partner.
Read in memory for the session, never stored, never used to train a model.
Letters, notices and legal analysis are drafts, not legal advice. Have a qualified lawyer review them before they are sent or relied on.
Free scan. Pay only on cash recovered.
Run Commercial Lease Co-Tenancy Anchor Auditor free on the last 12 months of files. If it finds money, the fee is 15 percent of what is actually recovered, nothing on what is not. After that, ongoing monitoring is $1,750 a month.
On a sample file: $51,900.00 in commercial lease co-tenancy rent overpayments identified for recovery across across 2 items.
Why not just use ChatGPT?
Rules that stay current: the rate cards, tariffs, code sets and regulations it checks against are kept up to date for you; a one-off prompt starts from nothing each time. Evidence that stands up: every finding cites the line, the file and the rule, so it holds up with a vendor, a payer or an auditor. The same answer every time: the checks are written rules, not a fresh guess, so this month's result can be compared with last month's. Nobody has to own it: no one inside has to build, test and maintain a home-made tool, and files are not pasted into a public chatbot.
Get a free scan
If you would rather talk it through, write to dev.sathya@baseloom.app; that reaches Dev Sathya, founder.