Carrier Residential Surcharge Auditor
$21.15 in erroneous carrier residential and delivery surcharges identified across across 4 items.
USPS RDI verifies destination is a commercial office suite. Residential surcharge of $5.65 is erroneous.
Method1Cross-referenced parcel delivery points against USPS CASS Residential Delivery Indicator (RDI).
2Formatted carrier billing dispute payload for automated carrier credit submission.
| Reference | Description | Refund_Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 1Z99281001 | Commercial Address Billed as Residential (1Z99281001) | $5.65 |
| 1Z99281002 | Commercial Address Billed as Residential (1Z99281002) | $5.65 |
| 1Z99281004 | Commercial Address Billed as Residential (1Z99281004) | $5.65 |
Carrier parcel invoice detail lines, plus USPS CASS commercial address database
Carrier invoice correction claim file and residential surcharge refund request (Resolution Dossier, Findings Schedule)
Run Carrier Residential Surcharge Auditor free on the last 12 months of files. If it finds money, the fee is 15 percent of what is actually recovered, nothing on what is not. After that, ongoing monitoring is $1,000 a month. 30% goes to the referring partner.
Read in memory for the session, never stored, never used to train a model.
Letters, notices and legal analysis are drafts, not legal advice. Have a qualified lawyer review them before they are sent or relied on.
Free scan. Pay only on cash recovered.
Run Carrier Residential Surcharge Auditor free on the last 12 months of files. If it finds money, the fee is 15 percent of what is actually recovered, nothing on what is not. After that, ongoing monitoring is $1,000 a month.
On a sample file: $21.15 in erroneous carrier residential and delivery surcharges identified across across 4 items.
Why not just use ChatGPT?
Rules that stay current: the rate cards, tariffs, code sets and regulations it checks against are kept up to date for you; a one-off prompt starts from nothing each time. Evidence that stands up: every finding cites the line, the file and the rule, so it holds up with a vendor, a payer or an auditor. The same answer every time: the checks are written rules, not a fresh guess, so this month's result can be compared with last month's. Nobody has to own it: no one inside has to build, test and maintain a home-made tool, and files are not pasted into a public chatbot.
Get a free scan
If you would rather talk it through, write to dev.sathya@baseloom.app; that reaches Dev Sathya, founder.